University of East Anglia UCU Rotating Header Image

Campaigns

UCU@UEA USS Strike 2018

UEA branch voted overwhelmingly – and on a record turn-out – to take strike action to defend the DB pension.

While there is debate over the financial implications of this, there is no evidence that maintaining a DB scheme is impossible. We believe that negotiations should resume to look at ways of managing the scheme.

The proposed change from UUK will disproportionately affect those at the start of their careers, or those intending to enter the profession in the future. We do not believe it is right that those colleagues should have worse work benefits than those later in their career; this would not be an act of solidarity, and is contrary to the communal ethos that underpins a university.

It is in this spirit that 1,000 professors – likely to be relatively unaffected by these changes – signed a letter to the Times Higher stating, “we want to stand shoulder to shoulder with all our colleagues, and especially the next generation, to defend our profession”. Similarly, we reject the current proposal on the grounds of its abandonment of early career staff, which will damage those colleagues as individuals, and the profession more broadly.

The planned strike days are as follows:

Week one – Thursday 22 and Friday 23 February (two days);
Week two – Monday 26, Tuesday 27 and Wednesday 28 February (three days);
Week three – Monday 5, Tuesday 6, Wednesday 7 and Thursday 8 March (four days);
Week four – Monday 12, Tuesday 13, Wednesday 14, Thursday 15 and Friday 16 March (five days)

There are strike FAQs here https://www.ucu.org.uk/uss-action-faqs

If you support the defence of pensions, and want to take strike action, it’s not too late to join UCU – https://www.ucu.org.uk/join

University pensions

UCU is opposed to the proposed change to the pension scheme and is balloting its members – more information here

UCU@UEA asked local MP Clive Lewis for his support and here is his statement:

“I echo the concerns voiced by Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner in her statement on the USS pension scheme changes which have been proposed, which would leave staff at older universities – such as University of East Anglia – significantly worse off in retirement.
UEA is one of Norfolk’s jewels – boosting the county both economically and culturally, so its future as a top-class university brings the region positive benefits.
UK Higher Education is world class, and UEA is competing on a world stage, increasingly successfully. But it’s vital that it retains its staff who are crucial in building that reputation.
I also know that the students in my constituency are caught in the middle of the dispute, and support the NUS joint statement with the staff union UCU saying that students benefit from a university sector where staff are properly paid and know they will receive a fair pension in retirement.”

Brexit: Our letter to candidates and press release

UCU seeks support for EU staff from Norwich general election candidates

 

The UCU branch at UEA recently asked all the general election candidates in Norwich North and Norwich South to sign up to a pledge to try to get the next government to grant existing EU nationals the right to remain in the UK.

UCU@UEA wrote to all the candidates on Friday 3 June, asking for replies by 6 June.

 

The branch issued a press release to local media, describing the challenge. The release was copied to the UEA press office, the SU, the UEA student paper/website ‘Concrete’ and to campus unions.
The story was published on the website of the Eastern Daily Press: http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/education/university-staff-call-on-norwich-election-candidates-to-eu-workers-rights-pledge-1-5045876

 

The effort was part of a campaign ‘Our universities are international – let’s keep them that way’, which UCU is running at UEA. This is linked to UCU’s national efforts on this theme: https://www.ucu.org.uk/we-are-international

group of international staff

 

By 1.30 on Tuesday 6 June, we had received supportive responses from all candidates except the two Conservatives, who had still not replied.

 

Norwich North

Green Candidate             Adrian Holmes                  Support

Tory Candidate                 Chloe Smith                        No reply

Labour Candidate            Chris Jones                         Support

Lib Dem Candidate          Hugh Lanham                    Support

Pirate Party Candidate   Liam Matthews                 Support

 

Norwich South
Green candidate              Richard Bearman              Support
Labour Candidate            Clive Lewis                          Support

Tory candidate                  Lana Hempsall                    No reply

Lib Dem candidate           James Wright                     Support

 

Support the campaign at UEA!

 

UCU@UEA is considering ideas for further activity in support of our EU colleagues. If you would like to join this campaign and offer ideas and support, write to us. We will send you  a pack of posters and stickers, a copy of UCU’s Post-Brexit guide and ideas for what you can do. Write to:

ucu.office@uea.ac.uk

 

Open Letter to UEA VC re closure of counselling courses

UCU National Secretary Sally Hunt has written to Prof David Richardson, UEA Vice-Chancellor to express concern over the announced closure of counselling course at UEA.  She notes that the proposals would damage the education of existing students and significantly impact provision of counselling teaching in the region at a time when there is growing recognition of the need for more investment in mental health provision and education.

 

Letter to Prof D Richardson UEA

HE BILL SNEAKING THROUGH

With the snap election just called, you might have thought that the current government’s Higher Education and Universities Bill was going to be delayed, but it looks as though they’re going to try to push it through next week before Parliament is prorogued. On 6 March the House of Lords voted for amendments to two of the most controversial features of the Government’s HE Bill: (1) the intention to link TEF to the ability to raise tuition fees, and (2) allowing new private providers degree-awarding powers without four years of validation by a university or approval by a quality assurance body. This was a rare instance of good news for our sector, and was the result of intense lobbying: from UCU, but also from concerned academics, students, parents, and others worried by the ramifications of these ill-conceived proposals.

 

With the final reading of the Bill looming, we cannot let up on the campaign now: the Lords were receptive to individuals raising their concerns, and when it returns to the House of Commons, we need to put pressure on our local MPs–especially for those of us who live in a constituency with a Conservative MP–to agree to these amendments. With the election foremost on MPs’ minds, they’ll be particularly likely to be attentive to their constituents’ concerns, especially where a university is so integral to the economic and cultural life of the area.

 

Make no mistake: the HE Bill as it currently stands is an existential threat to academic life in this country. And it is UCU that is fighting it: the representative bodies of university leaders, GuildHE and UUK, sent out a joint letter on 2 March ‘signalling [their] strong support’ for the Bill, so we cannot rely on our employers to defend British Universities.